Non-accidental piety: reliable reasoning and modally robust adherence to the divine will

Abstract In this article I formulate a skeptical argument against the possibility of adhering to divine will in non-accidental way. particular, my focus is on widely embraced modal condition accidentality, according which non-accidentality has do with person manifesting dispositions that result given outcome modally robust The arises from two observations: first, various authors epistemology religion have argued it often not possible reason reliably about religious matters, and second, non-accidentally norm associated reasoning requirements question reliable addition pointing out existence argument, outline strategies thinkers could reasonably challenge by denying necessary for manner. Hence, argue adherence does depend solely whether what requires one do.